Benjamin Lees skrev:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rolf Lampa [RIL] rolf.lampa@rilnet.comwrote:
Benjamin Lees wrote:
File caching is definitely worth it ... fetching a page stored in the file cache was about 5 times faster than Memcached/eAccelerator. <...> In any event, you still need the other cache types, since the file cache only works for anonymous users. <...> Just to be sure, did you look at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Cache ?
Thank you for answering, it was helpful to realize how all the cache types cooperate.
( I also had missed the above link! <looking blushed> )
I can see why you missed it. I've added some links to make it easier to find.
I suggested some more additions to the article text on the discussion page, based on your an Plaitonides comments. Please check if I got it right, and if not, correct. And add whatever essentials missing.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual_talk:$wgParserCacheType
The other closely related variables could (should) be commented as well (file cache seems to be commented here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:File_cache ).
// Rolf Lampa http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgParserCacheType