On 10 September 2010 14:06, Steve Bowbrick <Steve.Bowbrick(a)bbc.co.uk> wrote: If you're talking about an external link tacked on the end of an article, rather than a specific reference: an external link has to be one of the best few web links *in all the world* on that given topic. I would guess off the top of my head that this is unlikely to be the case for a TV show on an article that isn't specifically about that TV show, though it conceivably could. It would have to be better than almost every possible external link of any type in the world, though.

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Steve Bowbrick If there are transcripts that are licensable they would go well on WikiSource. As you've seen elsewhere on this mailinglist I'm convening GLAM-WIKI in

I created a template to link to the 330 episodes, {{In Our Time}}, and put instructions on  about 100 talk pages. The template links to the synopsis page and to the listen again page. Status of placing the links is also on the template documentation page.

New series of "In Our Time" starts today! Gordo

Hi all,        we had a small meetup in Bristol after Jimmy's talk, where we discussed potential partners such as museums, libraries and societies and how we can make use of meetings with them. I've written up some ideas here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Bristol/Local_outre… Clearly some fantastic work is already going on with the GLAM sector nationally, and locally Steve Virgin has been up to an enormous amount of local networking that this would build on. It would be great to get together a list of contacts and where we are with them. The above page could be used to list partners we're engaging with, and perhaps there should be a private page somewhere for sharing contact names, phone numbers and finding dates when we and the contacts are available. It may seem odd to put it in Wikiproject Bristol, and it's not ideal, but frankly I'm a bit confused by all the different places where WP/WM outreach material is supposed to go, and most importantly there are local Wikipedians who are crucial to the success of this effort, who can't be assumed to be watching the other sites (until we get interwiki watchlists). Any input welcome, -- Dr Martin L Poulter                ICT Manager, The Economics Network Based at the ILRT, University of Bristol: http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ The full experience: http://infobomb.org/ Wikipedia contributor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MartinPoulter Bias research: http://biasandbelief.wordpress.com/ Comedy music: http://www.myspace.com/glandscape Community blog: http://doodznchyx.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Roger We have approached the Bristol Museum (about a year ago) in an attempt to get them involved in Britain Loves Wikipedia. Although there was goodwill and interest, there was a lack of commitment at the top and this led nowhere back then. All of the museums FIVE of them, are owned by the City Council. They sponsored Jimmy Wales’ talk in Bristol & gave us a live webcast of the event for free. Therefore, I think the ‘ice’ at the top of the Council organisation is beginning to ‘thaw’ & that the Wikimedia team down here in Bristol has to go back in & speak to the people behind the museum. This is likely to be a direct outcome of Jimmy’s visit. There is added impetus as well. There is a new museum being built in Bristol that may be opening later this year (don’t know for sure). If I am right the council/museum organisers are going to be looking at ways to promote the new collection so the next couple of months might be perfect to go back in. Therefore, I for one, am very interested in what you are doing in Derby. Please keep me posted. Maybe we can share the lessons if we get the five Bristol Museums back onside Steve *From:* wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Roger Bamkin *Sent:* 20 January 2011 19:27 *To:* wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Ideas for local engagement Martin, Looks good. (Flattered to see you included the bit about the increased traffic on A History of the World in 100 Objects.) and the large increase in traffic. As you note the museums have the suff but we have the 400,000,000 visitors per month. Mike Peel took a photo at the BM amnd 3.8 million people saw it. I'm keen to see the UK initiatives to be seen as competing and co-operative. Is there opportunity to link up Bristol Museum with the project announced in Derby? I have suggested elsewhere that we have people learning from the collaboration day that happens before them and carrying the good points to the next. I have been after another museum outside London and yours seem close to being approached. I'm sad I didnt make it to Bristol but I will be there for the wikimedia meeting later this year cheers Roger aka Victuallers Link here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/Derby Press release http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Press_releases/First_GLAMWIKI_outside_Capital On 20 January 2011 16:03, Martin Poulter <M.L.Poulter(a)bristol.ac.uk> wrote: Hi all, we had a small meetup in Bristol after Jimmy's talk, where we discussed potential partners such as museums, libraries and societies and how we can make use of meetings with them. I've written up some ideas here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Bristol/Local_outre… Clearly some fantastic work is already going on with the GLAM sector nationally, and locally Steve Virgin has been up to an enormous amount of local networking that this would build on. It would be great to get together a list of contacts and where we are with them. The above page could be used to list partners we're engaging with, and perhaps there should be a private page somewhere for sharing contact names, phone numbers and finding dates when we and the contacts are available. It may seem odd to put it in Wikiproject Bristol, and it's not ideal, but frankly I'm a bit confused by all the different places where WP/WM outreach material is supposed to go, and most importantly there are local Wikipedians who are crucial to the success of this effort, who can't be assumed to be watching the other sites (until we get interwiki watchlists). Any input welcome, -- Dr Martin L Poulter ICT Manager, The Economics Network Based at the ILRT, University of Bristol: http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ The full experience: http://infobomb.org/ Wikipedia contributor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MartinPoulter Bias research: http://biasandbelief.wordpress.com/ Comedy music: http://www.myspace.com/glandscape Community blog: http://doodznchyx.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- Roger Bamkin (aka Victuallers) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Steve Bowbrick <Steve.Bowbrick(a)bbc.co.uk> wrote: > The producer of Melvyn Bragg's In Our Time are wondering if there'd be > any value in adding episodes from the In Our Time archive, which is now > complete, to relevant Wikipedia entries?

Hi Gordon, how's things? Doug