Competing with Wikipedia (replying to Fabian; sorry for breaking the threading) always
struck me as being a bit like arguing with yourself. Wikipedia is far from flawless (as a
concept, as a project, or as an encyclopaedia), but the whole point of it is to collect
and distribute information for free. What's to compete *with*?
Harry
Mitchellhttp://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: +44 (0) 7507 536971
Skype: harry_j_mitchell
From: Gordon Joly <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com>
To: wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Friday, 2 January 2015, 18:35
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] new book on Wikipedia
On 02/01/15 16:04, Simon Knight wrote:
Might be of interest.
Indeedy!
:-)
Gordo
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk