Competing with Wikipedia (replying to Fabian; sorry for breaking the threading) always struck me as being a bit like arguing with yourself. Wikipedia is far from flawless (as a concept, as a project, or as an encyclopaedia), but the whole point of it is to collect and distribute information for free. What's to compete *with*?
Phone: +44 (0) 7507 536971
Skype: harry_j_mitchell
From: Gordon Joly <gordon.joly@pobox.com>
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Friday, 2 January 2015, 18:35
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] new book on Wikipedia
On 02/01/15 16:04, Simon Knight wrote:
> Might be of interest.
>
>
>
Indeedy!
:-)
Gordo