On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:11 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
On 25 May 2011 09:46, Gordon Joly
<gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
> I think that the Wikimepdia community should be glad that the Twitter
> exposure and the question in Parliament (under parliamentary privilege)
> deflected interest away from the Wikipedia entry.
Although the original Telegraph journalist/editor didn't quote it, I
did say in talking to the journalist that UK editors would be liable
personally for edits they made :-)
For future reference:
_Wiki editors in England and Wales_ - provided the super-injunction
holder has not been granted corresponding restraint by the Scottish
Courts.
Legal advice provided to Wikinewsies indicates they'd have a great deal
of trouble getting that from the courts here - or prosecuting because
someone broke some silly English judge's ruling.
--
Brian McNeil.
--
brian.mcneil(a)wikinewsie.org | Wikinews Accredited Reporter.
http://en.wikinews.org |
http://www.wikinewsie.org
"Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news".