I think that the Wikimepdia community should be glad that the Twitter exposure and the question in Parliament (under parliamentary privilege) deflected interest away from the Wikipedia entry. Note that 75,000 are alleged to have tweeted the name. Where as the Wikipedia entry was edited by a handful at most. "We cannot put 75,000 people in prison". Indeed, and Wikipedia editors should take note...... (and yes I know that the servers are outside the UK and the publisher is not UK organisation). Suggestion: modify the living people rules..... since "you cannot libel the dead". Gordo -- Gordon Joly gordon.joly(a)pobox.com http://www.joly.org.uk/ Don't Leave Space To The Professionals!

On 25/05/2011 09:53, Chris Keating wrote: Admin only edited? Gordo Gordon Joly gordon.joly(a)pobox.com http://www.joly.org.uk/ Don't Leave Space To The Professionals!

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:11 +0100, David Gerard wrote: For future reference: _Wiki editors in England and Wales_ - provided the super-injunction holder has not been granted corresponding restraint by the Scottish Courts. Legal advice provided to Wikinewsies indicates they'd have a great deal of trouble getting that from the courts here - or prosecuting because someone broke some silly English judge's ruling. -- Brian McNeil. -- brian.mcneil(a)wikinewsie.org | Wikinews Accredited Reporter. http://en.wikinews.org | http://www.wikinewsie.org "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news".