Wherever we host it, the most important thing seems to be geo-targeted
notices. Where we host it doesn't actually matter, as long as we publicise
the link well.
On Jul 3, 2011 4:01 PM, "WereSpielChequers" <werespielchequers(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'd say that meta is the right place for meetup
pages, but with
pubilicity from other projects that might be relevant.
Holding it on Wikipedia might be seen as limiting it to Wikipedians.
The drawback of inviting non-wikimedians is that they may not be
interested in wikimedia. So I'd suggest one should proceed with
caution there (that said I'm hoping that one of our GLAM contacts will
be at next Sunday's London meetup..
WSC
On 2 July 2011 12:47, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2 July 2011 10:39, Tom Morris
<tom(a)tommorris.org> wrote:
We should be getting more non-Wikipedia people
involved and attending
events: because in-breeding isn't healthy.
And more non-techies, for the same reason.
- d.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org