Ragib,
(copied Tamil Wiki list)
We've faced an issue similar to Bug #5948. Due to non-canonicalisation, there are two articles on the same title in Tamil Wikipedia! http://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AE%AA%E0%AF%87%E0%AE%9A%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9A%E... (Tamil discussion)
- Sundar
"That language is an instrument of human reason, and not merely a medium for the expression of thought, is a truth generally admitted." - George Boole, quoted in Iverson's Turing Award Lecture
----- Original Message ----
From: Ragib Hasan ragibhasan@gmail.com To: Discussion list on Indian language projects of Wikimedia. wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wed, December 29, 2010 10:23:06 AM Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Indic languages & unicode issues.
I'm curious about the issue you are discussing ... is this similar to a long-standing bug that affects Bengali, Assamese, and Bishnupriya Manipuri wikipedias? https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5948
Ragib
User:Ragib on en and bn
-- Ragib Hasan, Ph.D NSF Computing Innovation Fellow and Assistant Research Scientist
Dept of Computer Science Johns Hopkins University 3400 N Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218
Website: http://www.ragibhasan.com
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:29 AM, BalaSundaraRaman sundarbecse@yahoo.com wrote:
Unicode's decision to bring the second encoding in
standard was widely debated and opposed mainly by FOSS developer community from Malayalam. Unicode announced the dual encoding scheme without canonical equivalence definition in 2005 and reverted it when scholars and developers opposed it.
Sadly, you're not alone in this, Santhosh. We have had canonical non-equivalence issues and many more (similar to the atomic chillu issue) in Tamil too. :( Part of it was inherited from the umbrellaish ISCII model (done with good intentions, I believe). They put the abugidas of the Indo-Aryan languages and other systems like
Tamil
(haven't studied other writing systems enough to comment upon) into one
bucket
and we're still suffering for that. They cite stability when legitimate
changes
are sought, but allow such breaking changes.
I'm sure you'll be working with the search engines to map the equivalent
glyph
sequences. Also, please explore mediawiki tech solutions to add redirects
or
hidden texts (though not ideal).
- Sundar
"That language is an instrument of human reason, and not merely a medium for
the
expression of thought, is a truth generally admitted."
- George Boole, quoted in Iverson's Turing Award Lecture
----- Original Message ----
From: Santhosh Thottingal santhosh.thottingal@gmail.com To: Discussion list on Indian language projects of Wikimedia. wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Sun, December 26, 2010 10:28:17 PM Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Indic languages & unicode issues.
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:43 PM, CherianTinu Abraham tinucherian@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, Happened to see Gerard's blog post on issues with Malayalam Wikipedia & Unicode upgrade to 5.1 http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2010/12/malayalam-enigma.html
The issue is very complex. There were heated debates around this topic in Unicode Indic Mailing list for years. In short the issue is about dual encoding- representing a letter using two types of unicode character codes. Unicode's decision to bring the second encoding in standard was widely debated and opposed mainly by FOSS developer community from Malayalam. Unicode announced the dual encoding scheme without canonical equivalence definition in 2005 and reverted it when scholars and developers opposed it. The same proposal again introduced. Foss community, language scholars protested the proposal. The SMC community submitted a document with 17 reasons why dual encoding should not be introduced.- see http://wiki.smc.org.in/images/2/23/SMC_Unicode_5.1.pdf Similarly a seminar conducted to discuss the issue by University of Kerala opposed the proposal. see http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080131071131/fci/images/1/19/Report_...
f
f But Unicode technical consortium did not bother to answer both of these reports and went ahead with the decision in Unicode 5.1. The dual encoding scheme is with out any canonical equivalence definition. Since it is not there in standard I doubt whether Operating systems will implement it, not to mention about search engines.
Since the new encoding scheme is defined without backward compatibility, or against unicode's stability policy, Malayalam FOSS community decided not to implement it until issues are resolved and continuing with unicode 5.0 encoding. Malayalam news portals also follow unicode 5.0. Most of the tools from Google also continue with unicode 5.0 based encoding. Malayalam wikipedia decided to go ahead with latest version of unicode. I had resisted this move in the discussion pages of Malayalam wikipedia. The decision was taken based on voting by a small community of editors and not based on proper technical analysis.
Believe it or not, this is how Malayalam wiki is rendered inWindows XP IE 8 box with OS default font: http://thottingal.in/tmp/ml-wiki-winxp-IE8.png I hope it gives some clue about the issue that Gerard mentioned.
Most of the discussions happened around the encoding issue was in Malayalam(in Malayalam wiki or in blogs), but this English blog post might summarize it http://www.j4v4m4n.in/2009/11/07/unicode-or-malayalam/
Discussions happened in Malayalam wikipedia(content in Malayalam language) http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%B5%E0%B4%BF%E0%B4%95%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%95%E...)
)
Thanks Santhosh Thottingal http://thottingal.in
Wikimediaindia-l l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l