The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts?
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi,
From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the
notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen < gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen < gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni < amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Provided that they complete the most used core message translations by the time they get final approval, I support the approval of both projects. It is evident that the two projects share a small but sturdy community, so it shouldn't be a problem for them to maintain both projects.
Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com, 9 Kas 2020 Pzt, 08:33 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen < gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni < amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I agree with this. If the community is more or less identical for both, it might send a wrong (discouraging) signal to only approve one of the two projects. best, jan
Am 10.11.2020 03:03, schrieb Vito Genovese:
Provided that they complete the most used core message translations by the time they get final approval, I support the approval of both projects. It is evident that the two projects share a small but sturdy community, so it shouldn't be a problem for them to maintain both projects.
Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com, 9 Kas 2020 Pzt, 08:33 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&...
This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
That's a good point. Agreed. Let's approve both. It also makes it easier for them to have a single "system" i.e. two separate wikis instead of one normal and one Incubator environment. I asked them to finish the most-used msgs.
Am Di., 10. Nov. 2020 um 12:21 Uhr schrieb Jan Wohlgemuth < linguist@spamcop.net>:
I agree with this. If the community is more or less identical for both, it might send a wrong (discouraging) signal to only approve one of the two projects. best, jan
Am 10.11.2020 03:03, schrieb Vito Genovese:
Provided that they complete the most used core message translations by the time they get final approval, I support the approval of both projects. It is evident that the two projects share a small but sturdy community, so it shouldn't be a problem for them to maintain both projects.
Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com, 9 Kas 2020 Pzt, 08:33 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&...
This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I agree with approving both at the same time.
-K
________________________________ From: Langcom langcom-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 3:34 AM To: Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee langcom@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Langcom] Meitei / Manipuri (mni) Wikipedia and Wiktionary
That's a good point. Agreed. Let's approve both. It also makes it easier for them to have a single "system" i.e. two separate wikis instead of one normal and one Incubator environment. I asked them to finish the most-used msgs.
Am Di., 10. Nov. 2020 um 12:21 Uhr schrieb Jan Wohlgemuth <linguist@spamcop.netmailto:linguist@spamcop.net>: I agree with this. If the community is more or less identical for both, it might send a wrong (discouraging) signal to only approve one of the two projects. best, jan
Am 10.11.2020 03:03, schrieb Vito Genovese:
Provided that they complete the most used core message translations by the time they get final approval, I support the approval of both projects. It is evident that the two projects share a small but sturdy community, so it shouldn't be a problem for them to maintain both projects.
Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.commailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>, 9 Kas 2020 Pzt, 08:33 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.ilmailto:amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.commailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.ilmailto:amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.commailto:mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&...
This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Do we already have expert approval, by the way? If not, I may have someone to ask.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
We don't, so that would be good.
Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il schrieb am Mi., 11. Nov. 2020, 15:43:
Do we already have expert approval, by the way? If not, I may have someone to ask.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I forwarded an email from an expert who approves that it's valid to the private list.
I'm fine with just approving both Wikipedia and Wiktionary.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020 ב-4:49 מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I agree. Activity is still going on, which is great and all the more a reason.
Am Mo., 11. Jan. 2021 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Amir E. Aharoni < amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>:
I forwarded an email from an expert who approves that it's valid to the private list.
I'm fine with just approving both Wikipedia and Wiktionary.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020 ב-4:49 מאת MF-Warburg < mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&... This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&...
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom