Hoi,From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition.Thanks,GerardM_______________________________________________On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too.I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone._______________________________________________בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:_______________________________________________The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018.The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mniI'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&wiki=incubatorwiki#distribution_2020-11I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts?
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom