The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&… This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&… I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni < amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il&gt; wrote: _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni &lt;amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il&gt; wrote: Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant. בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen ‏&lt;gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni &lt;amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il&gt; wrote: I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too. I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone. בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg ‏&lt;mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com&gt;om>: The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:

This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:

I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Hoi, There are two arguments, you only address one. Thanks, GerardM On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il<mailto:amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>> wrote: Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is irrelevant. בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard Meijssen ‏<gerard.meijssen@gmail.com<mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>>: Hoi, From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed the notion that for a second project we require more quality in localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a totally different proposition. Thanks, GerardM On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il<mailto:amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>> wrote: I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is OK, too. I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for everyone. בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת MF-Warburg ‏<mfwarburg@googlemail.com<mailto:mfwarburg@googlemail.com>>: The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:

This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:

I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&… This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&… I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&… This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018. The most-used msgs are almost complete: https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity: https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&… I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom