I agree with this. If the community is more or less
identical for both,
it might send a wrong (discouraging) signal to only approve one of the
two projects.
best,
jan
Am 10.11.2020 03:03, schrieb Vito Genovese:
Provided that they complete the most used core
message translations by
the time they get final approval, I support the approval of both
projects. It is evident that the two projects share a small but sturdy
community, so it shouldn't be a problem for them to maintain both
projects.
Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>, 9 Kas 2020 Pzt, 08:33
tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Hoi,
There are two arguments, you only address one.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni
<amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been
replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is
irrelevant.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard
Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hoi,
From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed
the notion that for a second project we require more quality in
localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as
a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in
Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for
Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a
totally different proposition.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni
<amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is
OK, too.
I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been
speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for
translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to
improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and
documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for
everyone.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת
MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>om>:
The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
This is
the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and
the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018.
The most-used msgs are almost complete:
https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:
I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that
language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org