I agree with this. If the community is more or less identical for both,
it might send a wrong (discouraging) signal to only approve one of the
two projects.
best,
jan

Am 10.11.2020 03:03, schrieb Vito Genovese:
> Provided that they complete the most used core message translations by
> the time they get final approval, I support the approval of both
> projects. It is evident that the two projects share a small but sturdy
> community, so it shouldn't be a problem for them to maintain both
> projects.
>
> Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>, 9 Kas 2020 Pzt, 08:33
> tarihinde şunu yazdı:
>
>> Hoi,
>> There are two arguments, you only address one.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 07:46, Amir E. Aharoni
>> <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
>>
>> Gerard, we already discussed this: Wiktionary hasn't yet been
>> replaced by Wikidata and won't be any time soon, so this argument is
>> irrelevant.
>>
>> בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 08:12, מאת Gerard
>> Meijssen ‏<gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hoi,
>> From my point of view, depending on what project, we always followed
>> the notion that for a second project we require more quality in
>> localisations. So no, first Wikipedia then Wiktionary. Wiktionary as
>> a project is being made redundant by the lexical support in
>> Wikidata, so giving it a priority is wrong. So even with my love for
>> Wiktionary, no rather not as a first if at all. Wikisource is a
>> totally different proposition.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 06:26, Amir E. Aharoni
>> <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
>>
>> I'd just approve both, but Wiktionary first and Wikipedia later is
>> OK, too.
>>
>> I should mention that over the last year and a half I've been
>> speaking to them and providing them tech support, mostly for
>> translatewiki activity. Their relevant questions caused me to
>> improve some things in translatewiki's configuration and
>> documentation in a way that hopefully makes working there easier for
>> everyone.
>>
>> בתאריך יום ב׳, 9 בנוב׳ 2020, 04:49, מאת
>> MF-Warburg ‏<mfwarburg@googlemail.com>:
>>
>> The activity of Wt/mni looks quite good:
>>
> https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wt/mni&wiki=incubatorwiki#distribution_2020-11
>> This is the 7th month of continuous activity as usually defined, and
>> the project is semi-continuously active since mid-2018.
>> The most-used msgs are almost complete:
>> https://robin.toolforge.org/?tool=codelookup&code=mni
>>
>> I'll add that the test-Wikipedia also has considerable activity:
>>
> https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/mni&wiki=incubatorwiki#distribution_2020-11
>>
>> I propose to approve mni Wiktionary as the first project in that
>> language, and hope that the Wikipedia can soon follow. Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>  _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>  _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>  _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom