Hi Everyone,
As you may or may not know, I've been asked to look into the past, present and future of the charities handling of technology. I've been looking to obtain ideas, thoughts, and input from various technological stakeholders within the charity on these topics.
The end goal is to produce a report with recommendations for how to approach technology in the future.
Right now, I am interested in what YOU think. How well has the charity handled technology (both operationally and project-wise). Do you have any ideas for the future? Any concepts for projects the charity could adopt?
If so; please get in touch with me to air your views!
To kick things off I've put together a short survey to collect information and hopefully get your creative juices flowing: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1gMBek07XIb-vH8sViLJ9eR-eZOQAt5Vu_10NVLzP55g...
It will only take 5 minutes and your response greatly appreciated.
Feel free to email me directly as well.
Cheers, Tom
On 23 July 2014 20:57, Thomas Morton morton.thomas@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
As you may or may not know, I've been asked to look into the past, present and future of the charities handling of technology. I've been looking to obtain ideas, thoughts, and input from various technological stakeholders within the charity on these topics.
Could you clarify what you mean by technology in this context? Otherwise the charity's management of Wankel rotary engines has been extremely poor.
On 24 July 2014 07:40, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July 2014 20:57, Thomas Morton morton.thomas@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
As you may or may not know, I've been asked to look into the past, present and future of the charities handling of technology. I've been looking to obtain ideas, thoughts, and input from various technological stakeholders within the charity on these topics.
It would be the topics now covered under "IT development" on the UK wiki.
That is where the Technology link on the left-hand sidebar leads.
Charles
As Charles says!
Also, it seemed rather wordy to list all of the technology we might touch; and one of the outcomes I’ve found so far is that we do touch more technology than expected.
In all seriousness; if you think the charity should be (or should have been) doing something with the Wankel rotary engine, make a case for it!
Regards, Tom
On 24 July 2014 at 09:37:28, Charles Matthews (charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com) wrote:
On 24 July 2014 07:40, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July 2014 20:57, Thomas Morton morton.thomas@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Everyone,
As you may or may not know, I've been asked to look into the past, present and future of the charities handling of technology. I've been looking to obtain ideas, thoughts, and input from various technological stakeholders within the charity on these topics.
It would be the topics now covered under "IT development" on the UK wiki. That is where the Technology link on the left-hand sidebar leads.
Charles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
I think it means "technology that the charity might develop to meet its objectives".
I'm afraid that the Wankel rotary engine will probably only go around in circles............
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:40 AM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 July 2014 20:57, Thomas Morton morton.thomas@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
As you may or may not know, I've been asked to look into the past, present and future of the charities handling of technology. I've been looking to obtain ideas, thoughts, and input from various technological stakeholders within the charity on these topics.
Could you clarify what you mean by technology in this context? Otherwise the charity's management of Wankel rotary engines has been extremely poor.
-- geni
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org