On 23 July 2014 20:57, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com> wrote: Could you clarify what you mean by technology in this context? Otherwise the charity's management of Wankel rotary engines has been extremely poor. -- geni

As Charles says! Also, it seemed rather wordy to list all of the technology we might touch; and one of the outcomes I’ve found so far is that we do touch more technology than expected. In all seriousness; if you think the charity should be (or should have been) doing something with the Wankel rotary engine, make a case for it! Regards, Tom On 24 July 2014 at 09:37:28, Charles Matthews (charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com) wrote: On 24 July 2014 07:40, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote: On 23 July 2014 20:57, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com> wrote: Hi Everyone, As you may or may not know, I've been asked to look into the past, present and future of the charities handling of technology. I've been looking to obtain ideas, thoughts, and input from various technological stakeholders within the charity on these topics. It would be the topics now covered under "IT development" on the UK wiki. That is where the Technology link on the left-hand sidebar leads. Charles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk