Hi all,
Things are indeed looking pretty good for the London Wikimania bid. We've
been preparing some stuff that we'll put online come the board meeting this
weekend, so please hang onto your hats until then!
Ed
On 6 February 2013 09:30, <wikimediauk-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to
wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wikimediauk-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
wikimediauk-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Wikimania 2014 (Thomas Dalton)
2. John Byrne stands down as Treasurer and Trustee of, Wikimedia
UK (John Byrne)
3. Re: Governance review (Thomas Dalton)
4. Re: Governance review (Jon Davies)
5. Re: Governance review (Thomas Dalton)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:24:03 +0000
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
To: wikimediauk-l <wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimania 2014
Message-ID:
<CALTQcceGcdm=
5B9ZYisnqtgnqhK3CnuOR_pc04FLDHYu7i5U9w(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The deadline for people the create bids for Wikimania 2014 has now
passed. London is the only official bid on the bidding page, although
there is an unofficial bid from Tanzania that is active so will
probably more up the page soon. So far, the Tanzanian bid doesn't look
particularly credible (although that may change as they improve their
bid page), so it seems London is in with an excellent chance. In that
light, can we get an update from the bid team?
In particular, the logistics page says a fundraising website would
launch in January and there would be a event for sponsors in February.
Can we get an update on those?
Thanks!
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:48:00 +0000
From: John Byrne <john(a)bodkinprints.co.uk>
To: wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] John Byrne stands down as Treasurer and
Trustee of, Wikimedia UK
Message-ID: <51110D90.5010609(a)bodkinprints.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
First, many thanks to all who have sent kind messages after my
resignation, here, on the blog & elsewhere. They are much appreciated.
On the board issues, I agree with Tango, especially as the Compass
review will be out shortly, which (sneak preview) has things to say
about the composition of the board, which will probably influence the
next election. Saad of course is "semi-elected" as he is the runner-up
in the last election with the highest votes who still wants to be on the
board.
John/Johnbod
On 05/02/2013 12:00, wikimediauk-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to
wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wikimediauk-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
wikimediauk-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: John Byrne stands down as Treasurer and Trustee of
Wikimedia UK (Thomas Dalton)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:09:54 +0000
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
To: UK Wikimedia mailing list <wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>rg>, HJ
Mitchell <hjmitchell(a)ymail.com>
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] John Byrne stands down as Treasurer and
Trustee of Wikimedia UK
Message-ID:
<CALTQcccg9wKPW2WMF+wswCFw32Y9=
VKmYSDv_UxpYz6ernHzPA(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
On Feb 4, 2013 5:14 PM, "HJ Mitchell" <hjmitchell(a)ymail.com> wrote:
Thinking constitutionally for a moment, this
leaves us with a relatively
small board, no treasurer, and quite a high proportion
of co-opted
trustees
(a ratio which will increase if a replacement for
John is co-opted).
Obviously the AGM is only four months away, which will soon be upon us,
and
> it might not be a situation that can be helped, but it doesn't seem to me
> (as a lay member) to be desirable.
>
> If the two vacant seats are filled by co-option, that still leaves a
> majority of the board elected, so I don't think the democratic legitimacy
> of the board is too badly hurt. If we weren't so close to the agm, there
> might be an argument for an egm rather than use co-option, but I think we
> can wait a little to have our say.
>