On 7 March 2014 11:28, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Bottom line: without WMUK having their finger in the
pie, process and aims
of a WiR are entirely down to the institution.
That simply isn't true.
Each of the residences and similar work I've undertaken, independent
of WMUK (and including the one that did involve WMUK, at ARKive), I've
negotiated the role, making clear what I would /and would not/ be
prepared to do, and that my edits would be made in the interests, and
according to the standards, of Wikipedia.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk