2009/8/11 geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>om>:
2009/8/10 Michael Peel <email(a)mikepeel.net>et>:
Hi all,
Anyone interested in the below? As I understand it, they want to
cover the range of philosophies on Wikipedia - they already have
people involved with an inclusionist or middle-ist point of view, but
no-one from a deletionist viewpoint.
Thanks,
Mike
Could be tricky. Classic deletionism is largely a spent force to the
point where the deletion/inclusion argument isn't anywhere near the
conflict it used to be. What do they need from those who take part?
Heh I would still tend to identify as a deletionist but for somewhat
different reasons than classic deletionism.
That's what I was thinking - there are very few people that actually
fall neatly into one of those categories. If they portray Wikipedia as
having a deletion/inclusion divide it will be rather misleading. We've
pretty much reached a consensus on what it means to be notable, it's
just how to apply that to individual cases that gives us material for
our much loved dramas.