And I'm sure that if we do anything in the tiniest way different from your interpretation of them you won't hesitate to let us know in your inimitable helpful and friendly fashion. On 12 Apr 2013 17:12, "Thomas Dalton" thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 April 2013 16:24, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
Really, you're looking for problems where none exists.
If we end up in a situation where nothing defines the number of
directors,
that's a problem that needs rectifying before an election process can
begin.
But in any other situation we know how stuff is supposed to work even if
the
language can be claimed to be ambiguous.
I tend to operate on the assumption that members of the charity will
behave
like adults.
These are legal documents. You can't just interpret them however you like. You have to do what they actually say. There is nothing ambiguous. It is all very clear, it just isn't what was intended.
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org