And I'm sure that if we do anything in the tiniest way different from your interpretation of them you won't hesitate to let us know in your inimitable helpful and friendly fashion.
On 12 April 2013 16:24, James Farrar <james.farrar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Really, you're looking for problems where none exists.
>
> If we end up in a situation where nothing defines the number of directors,
> that's a problem that needs rectifying before an election process can begin.
>
> But in any other situation we know how stuff is supposed to work even if the
> language can be claimed to be ambiguous.
>
> I tend to operate on the assumption that members of the charity will behave
> like adults.
These are legal documents. You can't just interpret them however you
like. You have to do what they actually say. There is nothing
ambiguous. It is all very clear, it just isn't what was intended.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org