David Gerard wrote:
2009/12/15 Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>om>:
Gordon Joly wrote:
No thanks. I take him to be a careerist
generating "amusing" paradoxes
about the Internet to gain attention.
Nicholas Carr only less subtle?
As grating as Andrew Keen but with added tendentious logic? Andrew Lih
for people who still really don't get it? By the way, I know nothing
about the Andrew Dalby book mentioned on the programme, but he talked
quite reasonably (Wales isn't a philosopher while Sanger is, but you
could argue that one), with the negative restricted to saying enWP is
not going to get much better.
Charles