I think it's unlikely to be honest, though you're welcome to try. Because
they're new works and often just photographs and/or digital works, maintaining
artificial scarcity is crucial for the artists to be able to make any money.
-----Original Message-----
From: wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of River Tarnell
Sent: 04 March 2010 7:56 PM
To: wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] Opportunity at Oxford MOMA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
With the recent discussions about working with museums, I thought this was interesting:
<http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/5034636.Gallery_gives_sneaky_snappers_an_amnesty/>
As the museum in Pembroke Street gets ready to close for six weeks for
refurbishment, staff are hunting for photographs taken surreptitiously in the
gallery to keep it alive online while it is closed.
Head of marketing Kirsty Kelso said: "We were going through Flickr and there
were lots of visitors who had come to the gallery and taken their own
photographs, despite signs saying 'no photography allowed'.
"We were taken aback by how many people had taken them, but we were secretly
quite pleased to see people making their own stories about the gallery."
- river.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (HP-UX)
iEYEARECAAYFAkuQEGIACgkQIXd7fCuc5vI2awCfZOqAwUPm+CEJgBkR6J2fqY6W
N3EAnR9eyx5TvZZpGRXw/HoKG6JoP1C0
=XZ6I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org