On 28 September 2012 23:29, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
Training led and run by volunteers has very little to
do with the objections
to the plan, which is about allocation of Chapter resources, focus, and
staff time. I don't see why we're running these two objections together.
Well, the muddle between "stakeholders" in WM stuff who happen to be
in the UK. and what WMUK thinks it can take on, has been ongoing for a
couple of years now. E.g. whether meetups are WMUK events, a
"membership service", or autonomous (the answer is obvious, by the
way).
We do need to clean house as far as getting the chapter's scope
discussed is concerned, and that is not a planning or budgetary
exercise. Personally, I'd start at the comms end. Loose talk is
costly.
Charles