An 22 August 2012 12:14, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sending this again because it went off-list by
accident. Anyone know
why Tom's email didn't have a reply-to header?
Yes; as part of the changes we made to the list last week, we set it
so that "reply" will by default only reply to the sender, and you have
to "reply-all" to send to the list, as one small way to make it more
likely that people know they're replying in a way that is published
and archived forever.
James.
--
James D. Forrester
jdforrester(a)gmail.com
[[Wikipedia:User:Jdforrester|James F.]] (speaking purely in a personal capacity)