On 17/01/2012 13:05, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 17 January 2012 12:51, Harry
Burt<harryaburt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I note that there is a petition with 280
signatures available at:
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/26143
It seems to be fairly strongly (but not badly IMHO) worded, so therefore
worthy of our support if we can get geolocation going.
I'd rather we wrote out
own petition. We should focus on the freedom
aspects and the workability of the acts, not things like job losses
(which I'm not even sure are true).
I tend to agree. The words is strong, and
does not scan that well since
it launches into a mixed diatribe. It does not set the scene, and scream
wildly about China and syria and all stations in between.
Gordo
P.S. Here is another petition that I urge you sign. And look at the
wording...
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/20968
since it much better example of how to word a petition.... IMHO
P.P.S. Save BBC World Service!
--
Gordon Joly
gordon.joly(a)pobox.com
http://www.joly.org.uk/
Don't Leave Space To The Professionals!