On 05/01/15 23:27, HJ Mitchell wrote:
Competing with Wikipedia (replying to Fabian; sorry
for breaking the
threading) always struck me as being a bit like arguing with yourself.
Wikipedia is far from flawless (as a concept, as a project, or as an
encyclopaedia), but the whole point of it is to collect and distribute
information for free. What's to compete *with*?
At present, nothing. But in future, a fork of Wikipedia?
Gordo