Q: I still
oppose the extended delegation suggestion. I'm not at all sure
what we could do with it that we couldn't without.
I agree - I dont see the advantage of this. A Scotland Committee, for
instance, could probably be appointed without needing
They could be appointed, sure, but they couldn't do anything. They
don't need all the director powers, just whichever ones are necessary
to carry out the objectives the board sets them. One big one would be
spending the charity's money (within a set budget).