Because the blog post response to The Daily Telegraph article wrote that
"“The Board is united in the view that this decision does not affect his
role as a Trustee of the charity."
Then again my conclusion was only an inference based on a sequence of
events. I take it you still stand by that comment?
WH.
On 6 August 2012 05:10, Michael Peel <michael.peel(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
On 5 Aug 2012, at 18:34, WilliamH wrote:
I find it odd that Ashley grasped the incompatibility of his position
before the rest of the board did, and more to the point, that they only did
grasp it *after* he stepped down.
{{citation needed}}. I'm curious to know why you think this?
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org