--
Rexx
On 1 July 2014 20:47, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com
wrote:
> On 1 July 2014 19:22, Andy Mabbett
andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
>
>> On 1 July 2014 18:45, HJ Mitchell
hjmitchell@ymail.com wrote:
>>
>> > I agree that other projects should be considered,
>> > as useful background if nothing else
>>
>> Quite.
>>
>> > but quibbling over details of the past isn't going to
>> > help the discussion move forward for the benefit
>> > of the *future* of these projects.
>>
>> I do not believe that reiterating my objection to past good work, by
>> me and others, being written out of the chapter's history is
>> "quibbling", much less "over details".
>>
>> Hmm, I recall an earlier thread on this list which was pretty much
> devoted to contention over how the history of Wikipedians in residence got
> written. This thread is intended to help a staff member do her job.
>
> It would be a shame, certainly, if WiRs became one of those "don't bring
> that up again" topics.
>
> Charles
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
>
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk
>