On Saturday, January 21, 2006, at 02:49 am, Angela wrote:
On 1/20/06, Andrew Walker <keggers(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
One thing I am not clear about is exactly what a
chapter is. Is it
just a group of people who edit wikipedia and who live in close(ish)
proximity to each other, or is it a legal entity of some kind?
I think it can be either, but
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Local_chapter_FAQ has more info on
this.
This implies that the chapters are a fairly flexible structure for
linking with Wikimedia Foundation. Have we been in touch with Delphine
(chapter coordinator) about this?
If it is the Foundation's wish to have direct control of the UK
chapter, then we would need to look at an alternative route. Though I'm
not certain one is available. I'm not sure if a "Foreign Branch"
(another form of company structure) can be registered with the Charity
Commission as a charity, for example. I have a sneaky suspicion that we
cannot just covenant (promise) all our income to the Foundation.
The nearest equivalent model that I know of is ActionAid, the
development/anti-poverty charity. ActionAid UK (AAUK -
www.actionaid.org.uk) is registered as a charity in the UK and based in
the UK. It is a member of Actionaid International (AAI -
www.actionaid.org), registered in the Netherlands, based in South
Africa. AAUK undertakes its own charitable work (events, grants to
organisations that furthers its mission etc), and also has "Committed
giving" and "Other donations" to AAI (see the Trustees' report at
http://www.actionaid.org.uk/100045/faqs.html ). As far as I can tell
from reading the Trustees' reports of both organisations, "Committed
giving" is a contracted programme of financial support provided by AAUK
to AAI, in return for AAI delivering some specific projects that are in
keeping with the aims of AAUK. "Other donations" are specific requests
by AII for financial support from AAUK. AAUK is legally independent of
AAI (though they share some directors and probably talk by email a
lot). AAUK makes grants and runs programmes that are independent of
AAl. Both AAi and AAUK have the same ethos.
So, how do I see this working with Wiki UK and Wikimedia Foundation?
1) the aims of UK and Foundation should be as closely aligned as
possible. (I think we've achieved this.)
2) UK will enter into some grant contracts with the Foundation to
deliver some specified work - eg the provision of 100,000 pages of an
online encyclopaedia free of charge to persons in the UK, in English,
for the calendar year 2007.
3) UK will consider requests for funding from organisations like the
Foundation for financial support for activities that further UK's aims.
This could include general financial support for the Foundation. But it
could also fund other groups and other activities (eg it could make a
grant to someone in Glasgow to run a "Wikis are great - contribute
today" event. )
4) UK will undertake its own activities, which will be in line with the
ethos of the Foundation, but will be independent (ie without a formal
contract between the two). So for example, UK could undertake, provide
grants to or commission:
a) events or teacher resources in the UK demonstrating/promoting the
use and development of online free resources (such as, say, Wikipedia
and WikiBooks)
b) the digitising of public domain content such as books, images etc to
enable wider public access to them via electronic dissemination (such
as, say, WikiBooks);
c) the translation of existing public domain resources (such as, say,
bits of Wikipedia) into other languages that would be of benefit to the
UK public (eg Urdu).
I think that would be how it would work in practice, and it would work
well.
Best wishes
Scott
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com