On 3 October 2012 12:16, Michael Peel <michael.peel(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
Of course, that still wouldn't be right -
'through banners on Wikipedia' would be more accurate. Getting media coverage 100%
accurate is difficult (if only they used wikis…) - sometimes inaccuracies just have to be
lived with, as grating as that is to any Wikimedian's soul. ;-)
I think it is implicit that "donations from Wikipedia visitors" means
"donations from Wikipedia visitors that are a direct result of them
visiting Wikipedia". No-one is going to expect us to quiz every donor
and turn them away if they say they once read a Wikipedia article!