If the QR code is for use on mobile phones then we may not want much more than a stub either. What is the maximum article size that would work on the typical modern phone?
WereSpielChequers
On 25 October 2011 23:32, Brian McNeil brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org wrote:
That's the sort of feedback I'm looking for, thanks.
I've no intention of vigorously arguing one way or the other, but I just feel it is inappropriate to point to a Wikipedia article that may never get much beyond stub status when orders of magnitude more content is elsewhere on WMF projects.
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 23:07 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 25 October 2011 22:55, Brian McNeil brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org
wrote:
All good stuff, but...
A QR code could be placed at a relevant war memorial, it points to a Wikibook collecting all the soldiers' letters, with scans and
transcripts.
I'd rather the QR code point (via QRpedia) to a Wikipedia article about the memorial, and have that point to relevant pages on commons/ Wikisource, and the book.
Brian McNeil.
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil - Accredited Reporter. Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news.
Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org