If the QR code is for use on mobile phones then we may not want much more than a stub either. What is the maximum article size that would work on the typical modern phone?
WereSpielChequers
That's the sort of feedback I'm looking for, thanks.
I've no intention of vigorously arguing one way or the other, but I just
feel it is inappropriate to point to a Wikipedia article that may never
get much beyond stub status when orders of magnitude more content is
elsewhere on WMF projects.
Brian McNeil.
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 23:07 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 25 October 2011 22:55, Brian McNeil <brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org> wrote:
>
> All good stuff, but...
>
> > A QR code could be placed at a relevant war memorial, it points to
> > a Wikibook collecting all the soldiers' letters, with scans and transcripts.
>
> I'd rather the QR code point (via QRpedia) to a Wikipedia article
> about the memorial, and have that point to relevant pages on commons/
> Wikisource, and the book.
>
--
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil - Accredited Reporter.
Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org