I was assuming that part of the project would involve making sure the
article wasn't just a stub...
On 25 October 2011 23:32, Brian McNeil <brian.mcneil(a)wikinewsie.org> wrote:
That's the sort of feedback I'm looking for,
I've no intention of vigorously arguing one way or the other, but I just
feel it is inappropriate to point to a Wikipedia article that may never
get much beyond stub status when orders of magnitude more content is
elsewhere on WMF projects.
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 23:07 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 25 October 2011 22:55, Brian McNeil
All good stuff, but...
A QR code could be placed at a relevant war
memorial, it points to
a Wikibook collecting all the soldiers' letters, with scans and transcripts.
I'd rather the QR code point (via QRpedia) to a Wikipedia article
about the memorial, and have that point to relevant pages on commons/
Wikisource, and the book.
- Accredited Reporter.
Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news.
Wikimedia UK mailing list