On 13 June 2012 09:44, Gordon Joly <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
Why choose the name "wikimedia" when the
public are in general much more
familiar with the term "wikipedia"? Are we guilty of being to close the
issue and not seeing the wider picture (but that was was given as the reason
for the formal name change at the AGM???)? Is there now time to reflect?
'Cos Wikinews and Wiktionary and Wikiquote and Wikibooks and so on exist too!
And, of course, Commons. Provider of high quality educational
materials and/or nude works including Muppets. ;-)
--
Tom Morris
<http://tommorris.org/>