On 13 June 2012 09:44, Gordon Joly gordon.joly@pobox.com wrote:
Why choose the name "wikimedia" when the public are in general much more familiar with the term "wikipedia"? Are we guilty of being to close the issue and not seeing the wider picture (but that was was given as the reason for the formal name change at the AGM???)? Is there now time to reflect?
'Cos Wikinews and Wiktionary and Wikiquote and Wikibooks and so on exist too!
And, of course, Commons. Provider of high quality educational materials and/or nude works including Muppets. ;-)