If we pencil in 9-10 Feb for the EGM then we have until, say, the end of
November to discuss and agree on the proposal. I do think we need to have a
reasoned argument set out in favour of the change before we call the EGM
itself - after all a constitution is not something that we should tinker
with lightly, hence the requirement for it to pass with a 75% change.
I've started this:
bringing together the arguments that various people have already made on
this list. Please go ahead and expand!
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Gordon Joly <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
This could run and run! How about a guillotine motion?