On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Only the election committee has that information,
so one of them
would
have to do it (or publish a list of votes received). It's not a bad
idea, but I don't feel comfortable asking the committee to do any
extra work - I would be very happy if they volunteered to do it
anyway, though.
Since there are no hard rules for suffrage, it's not even
possible to
determine who is supposed to vote but hasn't. If the pool of
possible
electors was more well-defined, this would be a trivial task.
I thought it was the list of people who noted an interest on being a
member by the start of voting?
KTC