On 22 Sep 2008, at 19:24, geni wrote:
2008/9/22 Kwan Ting Chan ktc@ktchan.info:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 14:07 -0400, Andrew Whitworth wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Only the election committee has that information, so one of them would have to do it (or publish a list of votes received). It's not a bad idea, but I don't feel comfortable asking the committee to do any extra work - I would be very happy if they volunteered to do it anyway, though.
Since there are no hard rules for suffrage, it's not even possible to determine who is supposed to vote but hasn't. If the pool of possible electors was more well-defined, this would be a trivial task.
I thought it was the list of people who noted an interest on being a member by the start of voting?
KTC
There is. Problem is I'm not sure I should be saying who has and hasn't voted.
Why not just re-spam everyone, saying "If you haven't voted yet, do so before it's too late" (except phrased better)?
Mike