It is intentional, yes. The idea is you have a completely new
election, although we don't have to do it this way if we don't want
to.
On Jan 16, 5:02 pm, "Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dal...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Details are
here: Please let me know if you think they will be effective as
drafted.
Comments / changes as always welcome on meta or
this email list.
As it is currently written, even those that do get over 50% would have
to retire at the EGM, is this intentional? They've been duly elected
to a 1 year term by a majority of the membership, I don't see why they
can't complete it.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.orghttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UKhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l