Agree with Mike on that - and I hope everyone will be pleased to learn that
we've already been talking to our developers about how best to implement a
system to ensure a seamless changeover. We've been very lucky in finding
two developers who know how to keep their eye on the community pulse and
are willing to "go the extra mile" for us when we need them.
Thanks to all involved in making sure the technology works!
--
Rexx
On 11 February 2013 20:31, Michael Peel <michael.peel(a)wikimedia.org.uk>wrote;wrote:
On 11 Feb 2013, at 20:02, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013 7:59 PM, "geni"
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For example the next issue is how WMUK plans to pay for the upkeep of
QRpedia given that it wasn't in the budget.
There shouldn't be an issue there. The costs are minimal. Renewal costs
for
two domain names and maybe a few hours work by the existing IT
contractors to transition things and sort out the security concerns that
have been raised. The budget can absorb that.
The need to have developer resources available to set up QRpedia on WMUK
servers, and to maintain and improve it, has been thought about for a while
now and was incorporated into this year's developer budget (although the
activity plan doesn't explicitly state this).
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org