On 09/08/15 01:03, Richard Farmbrough wrote:
I guess when it is sufficiently fast that I don't have time to hit "edit source" instead before it loads, I will start using it on other projects. Until then, a good character editor beats a good WIMPS editor
- pity it's not a good character editor.
WIMPS or WYSIWYG?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIMP_%28computing%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG
My religion is Emacs, so most of the time I would rather be in that exalted state.
My concern is that WYSIWYG can be poor on semantics. The idea that the look is more important the structure leads to the use BOLD rather that a section header says <h2>random words</h2>. Is the Wiki markup language that difficult? Is there good support in the visual editor for all constructs?
Having said that I must around to trying out the new visual editor.
:-)
Gordo