On 25 June 2012 18:49, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It may surprise you to hear that Mike was the one arguing for contractors,
so this certainly isn't a matter of refusing to budge from your first
decision.
Is Mike's view that having a contractor in to fix the SSL problem would
cost too much generally shared? The SSL does impact on the credibility of
the fundraiser, which raised £1M last time and one would hope that number
would go up in future. As a percentage of one year's take, what is "too
much"?
Charles