On 18 June 2012 17:44, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 18 June 2012 15:28, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
No amount of corporate jargon and/or
penny-pinching can cover up not
getting the right person for the job because the position is a vaguish
proposition. So I think Tom has a point.
I don't think the problem is a vague position. It's our first tech
hire, so the job is to do all our tech work.
All WMUK's existing tech work, or all in prospect. I'm a week into a
job that might require tech support, such as deciding how to host a
LAMP program within WMUK's hosting, which (as I understand) was or is
being changed. I know less than most people on this list in this area;
but if you advertise for a handyperson, that is what you'll get. And
without certain skills, a new project may require a new person or
contractor.
In any case there was a job spec set out 18 months ago, I recall.
Charles