On 18 June 2012 17:44, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2012 15:28, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
No amount of corporate jargon and/or penny-pinching can cover up not getting the right person for the job because the position is a vaguish proposition. So I think Tom has a point.
I don't think the problem is a vague position. It's our first tech hire, so the job is to do all our tech work.
All WMUK's existing tech work, or all in prospect. I'm a week into a job that might require tech support, such as deciding how to host a LAMP program within WMUK's hosting, which (as I understand) was or is being changed. I know less than most people on this list in this area; but if you advertise for a handyperson, that is what you'll get. And without certain skills, a new project may require a new person or contractor.
In any case there was a job spec set out 18 months ago, I recall.
Charles