In the light of the recent announcement by the Wikimedia Foundation that paid editing is not acceptable for employees, and the apparent swift termination of a long term employee, I believe it appropriate for the Board of Trustees of Wikimedia UK to agree a policy at the next board meeting to require employees, contractors and trustees to publicly declare any current or past paid editing activities, or related unpaid advocacy that may represent a potential conflict of interest.
The risk to the charity by allowing confidential declarations limited to the board in this area, or to "overlook" past paid editing (even if some years ago) is that a current board member, employee or contractor may be perceived to be deliberately misleading the Wikimedia community. Were this to be exposed then Wikimedia UK may suffer reputational damage if seen to be supporting procedures that protect this secrecy.
Considering the recent resignation of an Arbcom member, after avoiding a public declaration of off-wiki accounts where they were advocating matters related to Wikimedia projects, I would hope that the board would require employees and contractors to similarly interpret "related advocacy" as applying to "secret" accounts elsewhere whenever they can be seen to relate to Wikimedia projects or Wikimedia UK matters. The board of trustees will already be aware that such undeclared accounts already exist.
I have posted this same proposal at < https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Engine_room#Declarations_for_paid_editing_and_..., however I recommend that should anyone wish to discuss specific examples, including naming or linking to the WMF employee case, that this is limited to this independent email list rather than using the WMUK wiki.
Thanks Fae -- faewik@gmail.com http://j.mp/faewm