Not from me, if that is what you are implying. I have not been in touch
with either publication. As for the Signpost piece, it is a fair summary of
what they wrote, which is the Signpost's job to deliver.
Andreas
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:01 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9 February 2013 20:56, Andy Mabbett
<andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 9 February 2013 13:08, Thehelpfulone
<thehelpfulonewiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/14428/wikimedia_uk_tr…
This also refers to an "an intellectual
property dispute over
QRPedia", which is, of course, bunkum.
Oh, look who else quotes this claim:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-02-11/In_th…
I wonder where they got it from.
- d.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org