Hi James (and others)
What I find puzzling in your reasoning is that you automatically assume
bad faith on the part of the WMF. At this point everyone should be
concerned about the fact that over the past months we have had several
(highly) irregular activities within the UK chapter. It is important that
we (as in the movement) conduct a thorough review to see what the complete
facts are so that we can make sure that we can learn from this and draw
proper conclusions.
In the meantime the fact that the UK will not payment process will allow
them to focus on getting things in order. Please recall that payment
processing has nothing to do with actual funds, the UK chapter will still
apply to the FDC for funds (I am assuming)
Please don't make the foundation be the bad guy in this, this is not about
a power grab, this is about finding out what really happened in a
potentially very serious situation rather than simply moving on.
Jan-Bart de Vreede
Vice Chair
Board of Trustees
Wikimedia Foundation
On 29 sep. 2012, at 17:06, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As best as I can tell, the WMF doesn't trust any chapter to raise funds,
feeling threatened by any slight sign of independence that a chapter might
exhibit.
This is a naked power-grab by the WMF as they have taken the opportunity
to do what they've been wanting to do for months.
And I am confident that fundraising won't be coming back. Bureaucracies
don't surrender power - ever.
On Sep 29, 2012 3:07 PM, "HJ Mitchell" <hjmitchell(a)ymail.com> wrote:
The WMF don't trust WMUK to raise funds.
Perhaps too succinct? ;)
(this email is not intended to express my opinion on the issue, because
I've yet to form one)
Harry Mitchell
http://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: 024 7698 0977
Skype: harry_j_mitchell
------------------------------
*From:* Doug Weller <dougweller(a)gmail.com>
*To:* UK Wikimedia mailing list <wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Sent:* Saturday, 29 September 2012, 14:59
*Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Joint statement with the Foundation
Can someone here please explain this issue succinctly?
Thanks.
Doug
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sep 29, 2012 1:40 PM, "Neil Harris" <neil(a)tonal.clara.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 29/09/12 13:20, James Farrar wrote:
>>
>> Indeed, and for now I remain a member.
>>
>> This is subject to finding out precisely why the charity is
voluntarily
>> throwing away money.
>> On Sep 28, 2012 11:11 PM, "Deryck Chan" <deryckchan(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>
>
> Doesn't Gift Aid depend on the recipient, not the payment processor?
>
> If so, I would have thought that donating to WMUK, even with WMF
acting as
the
payment processor, would presumably be entitled to Gift Aid.
Don't be fooled by the WMF's political choices of language. We're not
talking about payment processing, we're talking about who is actually
fundraising.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
--
Doug Weller
http://www.ramtops.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org