On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Gordon Joly <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
On 16/09/12 20:02, Thomas Dalton wrote:
Since Roger is, I understand, being paid by the
Government of
Gibraltar to work on GibraltapediA, I think this constitutes paid
editing.
And in no way conflicts with his legal status as a Trustee?
Gordo
Dan Murphy on Wikipediocracy asked,
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=17594#p17594
---o0o---
I'm feeling more than usually dim. Is this the story? "Roger Bamkin, a
trustee of the Wikimedia Foundation UK, is a paid PR consultant for
Gibraltar and secured the agreement of Wikimedia UK to promote his client's
interests."
If so, wow.
---o0o---
His question was based on the draft minutes of the 8 September meeting here
http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minutes_8Sep12&oldid=28591#2.…
which said,
---o0o---
Gibraltarpedia update / MOU - Roger (25 mins)
Roger updated the board on Gibraltarpedia, and explained how he would like
to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Wikimedia UK. This would not
involve the transfer of any funds, but would mean that Wikimedia UK would
offer in-kind support in the form of press coverage and various merchandise.
*DECISION: It was agreed that the office can support Gibraltarpedia with
in-kind contributions, but not funds*
---o0o---
I understand the minutes are still being edited, but surely, we can assume
that the decision outlined there was indeed taken at the 8 September
meeting.
And if so, then I have to say it looks to me very much like Dan's summary
was correct. If it isn't, what exactly about it is untrue?
Andreas