Tom,
Please re-read the statement.
The board:
a) acknowledges mistakes have been made
b) acknowledges that those mistakes have had a damaging impact
c) identified a process (the review) which will not only look closely at
what went on, but will produce "clear recommendations which will help us
follow best practice in every area of governance".
I think you bring very important insights which can and should help get
WMUK to where it needs to be. However I don't think you help people grasp
the importance of what you suggest when you take umbrage where it is not
necessary.
all the best
Fabian
(User:Leutha)
Tom Dalton wrote:
The board needs to learn how to write a statement that
actually says
something...
Apologising for mistakes is meaningless if you don't acknowledge what
those mistakes are. This statement comes across as defensive and empty
of actual content.
What have you done wrong? What are you doing about fixing the problems
caused by those mistakes and making sure similar mistakes don't happen
again? That's what people want to know. If you want to wait until the
review is complete before going into details, then say that. Don't
.post this
kind of meaningless drivel.